Prop. 10, a proposed $5 billion bond issue meant to foster the use of alternative fuels, is running up against opposition from what might sound like an unexpected quarter: environmental groups.

The Sierra Club, Union of Concerned Scientists and California League of Conservation Voters say the measure, which would cost nearly $10 billion over 30 years when interest on the bonds is included, is too expensive, especially in light of the state’s budget problems.

A Sierra Club lobbyist, Jim Metropulos, mentions another concern of the activists: whether the measure would benefit one of its strongest supporters, T. Boone Pickens, and a natural gas company in which he is a part owner, Clean Energy Fuels in Seal Beach.

“This is not really a green initiative,” Metropulos said. “It’s mostly about greed.”

Taxpayer groups and other environmental groups also oppose the measure.

Supporters say Prop. 10 is worth the investment.

“We appreciate the budget situation, the financial crisis,” said Amy Thoma, spokeswoman for a group called “Yes on 10.” “But we think we can’t afford not to do Prop. 10.”

Of the $5 billion bond issue, $3.4 billion would be used to help consumers and others buy high gas mileage or alternative fuel vehicles, including cars that run on natural gas.

Some $1.25 billion will go for research, development and production of renewable energy, mainly solar power.

The bond measure also would provide grants to cities for renewable energy projects and to colleges for training in related technologies.

The goal is to reduce air pollution, including greenhouse gases that contribute to climate change.

Related coverage:

• Poll: What do you think of the alternative energy propositions?
• Prop. 10: Criticisms range from profits to regulatory limits
• Prop. 10: Supporters say measure moves the state toward broader use of alternative fuels
• Prop 10: Not the only ballot measure to address alternative energy
• Prop. 7 renewable energy plan not inclusive enough, critics say
• All election coverage

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.