Latest Headlines on OCRegister.com
[x] Close
Green OC ~ All things green in Orange County.

UCI prof, other Nobelists urge Obama to raise green tech funding

July 18th, 2009, 3:00 am · 4 Comments · posted by

Renowned UC Irvine chemist F. Sherwood Rowland joined 33 other Nobel Prize winners in sending a letter to President Obama this week, urging him to fulfill his promise of $150 billion in clean energy technology funding.

UCI's Rowland (left) received the Nobel Prize in 1995. Photo by Eric Roxfelt/AP.

UCI's Rowland (left) received the Nobel Prize in 1995. Photo by Eric Roxfelt/AP.

Nobel laureates from USC, UC Santa Barbara, UC Berkeley, Stanford and other U.S. universities signed the letter, which criticizes the recently passed the American Clean Energy and Security Act (H.R. 2454). Rowland and his Nobel colleagues say that the Act does not provide the stable, annual funding that Obama promised earlier this year.

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is one promising technology which Obama supports. It re-routes carbon emissions from coal power plants and locks up that pollution securely underground. But Rowland say so far, Congress has not come anywhere close to support the long term effort needed to refine CCS.

“The President needs to remember his campaign statements and impress them upon Congress,” Rowland said Friday.

Under the act, payments from a “cap and trade” pollution allowance exchange will help fund the development of clean energy infrastructure and technology. Companies that can afford to pay for pollution credits will essentially help fund private and public research towards cheaper, more efficient clean energy technology.

But the Nobel scientists say that the act only provides 1/15th of the green tech budget promised by the president. Earlier this year, President Obama proposed to invest $150 billion over 10 years in energy efficiency and carbon reduction research.

In a press statement, physicist Burton Richter and the lead Nobel signee said that with sound research investments, rapid progress can be expected in technologies that will make buildings, vehicles, and industrial processes much more efficient and affordable than any available today.

“Congress so far has failed to act,” the statement said. “The climate legislation will not be nearly as effective if it does not provide for strong and stable funding of research.”

The letter was written in partnership with the Federation of American Scientists, a science policy organization founded by scientists who worked on the Manhattan Project.

Latest posts:

  • Record June ocean temps “consistent” with global warming
  • O.C. scientist: breaking fragile soil crust makes weeds grow wild
  • New at the mall: recycling — by the ton
  • Guava fruit fly invades O.C.
  • El Nino is back — but will it bring rain to O.C.?
  • ‘European style’ bike-sharing to begin in Newport
  • Solar power deals available in Huntington Beach
  • Laguna and Newport top 2008 beach closures in county report
  • Stimulus money to fund Huntington Beach wetland restoration
  • State to require sun-blocking car windows
  • O.C. study: premature births linked to heavy air pollution
  • EPA: Air pollution cancer risk higher in parts of O.C.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
    Reader Comments
    Comments are encouraged, but you must follow our User Agreement.
    1. Keep it civil and stay on topic.
    2. No profanity, vulgarity, racial slurs or personal attacks.
    3. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked.

     4 Comments

    • Bob Holt says:

      We need at least 40 new nuclear sites if we are ever going to be energy independent and recycle waste like France. All these green ideas account for about 1% of our energy needs and are only feel good ideas. I am tired of these Al Gore carbon credit scams and cap and trade that will kill this country.

    • Slouch says:

      Who pays this guys salary? Government! who has funded his research over the years? Government! No surprise he wants our Bankrupt Government to print even more money and destroy our economy further on energy programs that are expensive and have not been proven to work efficiently!

    • kevin says:

      I’d urge the same too, if my livelihood depended on it. Obama ought to raise fundung for ME, I’m too big to fail…

    • popcorn says:

      Political science, run with it…. your scientific credibility will be destroyed, but run with it.

    SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline